Staying longer saves on travel, above all
The biggest factor is often not the hotel, but transportation. A study in the Journal of Cleaner Production on vacation trips to southern France identified the journey there as the largest contributor to the carbon footprint examined; mode of transportation and length of stay played a significant role.
A simple calculation illustrates this. Suppose your vacation destination is 500 kilometers away:
1 × 12-day vacation: 1,000 km round trip
2 × 6-day vacations: 2,000 km round trip
4 × 3-day vacations: 4,000 km round trip
The same number of vacation days, but up to four times as many kilometers traveled to get there. How big the difference in emissions actually is, of course, depends on whether you travel by train, car, or plane.
An international study of 32 destinations also concludes that shorter stays require more trips to and from the destination—and thus more transportation—for the same number of overnight stays.
And what about the hotel?
There, too, there are good reasons to stay several nights: check-in, check-out, room preparation, and certain cleaning processes must be repeated with every guest change. With a three- or five-night stay, these processes are spread out over a longer period.
But doesn’t hopping from hotel to hotel distribute the money more effectively?
That can be an argument: Those who use different accommodations at least spread their lodging expenses across multiple establishments. However, staying longer doesn’t automatically mean that the money ends up in just one place. A study of 5,300 travelers to Norway indicates that longer stays allow more time to visit smaller businesses and less central locations within a region. Slow Stay can therefore also distribute regional economic value more broadly—just in a different way.
Hotel-hopping doesn’t have to be a contradiction to Slow Travel. A week-long train trip through South Tyrol, with a few nights spent in two or three different places, can help distribute regional economic value—without constantly generating long travel times to new destinations.
Our conclusion: It’s not the number of hotels that matters. What’s more important are distance, mode of transportation, and travel frequency. It’s better to travel long distances less often and move around slowly once you’re there than to start from scratch for every short trip.